<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;OWL 2&#8243; is the Next Version of the Web Ontology Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/</link>
	<description>Make lots of money through stealth in shadows</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Clark</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-7618</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-7618</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

Actually the next version will just be called "OWL 2", not "OWL 2.0". And it's not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It's just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called "OWL 1.1".

Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.

But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called "OWL 2". Some future version of Pellet will support that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Actually the next version will just be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;, not &#8220;OWL 2.0&#8221;. And it&#8217;s not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It&#8217;s just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called &#8220;OWL 1.1&#8221;.</p>
<p>Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.</p>
<p>But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;. Some future version of Pellet will support that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Clark</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8476</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8476</guid>
		<description>Hi John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually the next version will just be called "OWL 2", not "OWL 2.0". And it's not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It's just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called "OWL 1.1".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called "OWL 2". Some future version of Pellet will support that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Actually the next version will just be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;, not &#8220;OWL 2.0&#8221;. And it&#8217;s not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It&#8217;s just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called &#8220;OWL 1.1&#8221;.</p>
<p>Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.</p>
<p>But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;. Some future version of Pellet will support that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Clark</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8426</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8426</guid>
		<description>Hi John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually the next version will just be called "OWL 2", not "OWL 2.0". And it's not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It's just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called "OWL 1.1".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called "OWL 2". Some future version of Pellet will support that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Actually the next version will just be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;, not &#8220;OWL 2.0&#8221;. And it&#8217;s not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It&#8217;s just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called &#8220;OWL 1.1&#8221;.</p>
<p>Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.</p>
<p>But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;. Some future version of Pellet will support that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Clark</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8402</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8402</guid>
		<description>Hi John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually the next version will just be called "OWL 2", not "OWL 2.0". And it's not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It's just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called "OWL 1.1".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called "OWL 2". Some future version of Pellet will support that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Actually the next version will just be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;, not &#8220;OWL 2.0&#8221;. And it&#8217;s not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It&#8217;s just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called &#8220;OWL 1.1&#8221;.</p>
<p>Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.</p>
<p>But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;. Some future version of Pellet will support that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Clark</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8214</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8214</guid>
		<description>Hi John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually the next version will just be called "OWL 2", not "OWL 2.0". And it's not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It's just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called "OWL 1.1".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called "OWL 2". Some future version of Pellet will support that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Actually the next version will just be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;, not &#8220;OWL 2.0&#8221;. And it&#8217;s not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It&#8217;s just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called &#8220;OWL 1.1&#8221;.</p>
<p>Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.</p>
<p>But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;. Some future version of Pellet will support that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Clark</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8212</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8212</guid>
		<description>Hi John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually the next version will just be called "OWL 2", not "OWL 2.0". And it's not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It's just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called "OWL 1.1".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called "OWL 2". Some future version of Pellet will support that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Actually the next version will just be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;, not &#8220;OWL 2.0&#8221;. And it&#8217;s not that OWL 1.1 has been relabelled. It&#8217;s just that OWL 1.1 is the name of the OWLED-produced set of documents that were submitted to W3C to kick-start the OWL WG. They will always be called &#8220;OWL 1.1&#8221;.</p>
<p>Pellet 1.5.1 supports OWL 1.1.</p>
<p>But the next version of the standard, blessed by W3C eventually, will be called &#8220;OWL 2&#8221;. Some future version of Pellet will support that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnGoodwin</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-7615</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnGoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-7615</guid>
		<description>Good to meet you at OWLED - hope you enjoy you're well earned beer :)

So just to clarify...what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to meet you at OWLED &#8211; hope you enjoy you&#8217;re well earned beer :)</p>
<p>So just to clarify&#8230;what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnGoodwin</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8475</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnGoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8475</guid>
		<description>Good to meet you at OWLED - hope you enjoy you're well earned beer :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So just to clarify...what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to meet you at OWLED &#8211; hope you enjoy you&#8217;re well earned beer :)</p>
<p>So just to clarify&#8230;what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnGoodwin</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8425</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnGoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8425</guid>
		<description>Good to meet you at OWLED - hope you enjoy you're well earned beer :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So just to clarify...what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to meet you at OWLED &#8211; hope you enjoy you&#8217;re well earned beer :)</p>
<p>So just to clarify&#8230;what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnGoodwin</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8401</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnGoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8401</guid>
		<description>Good to meet you at OWLED - hope you enjoy you're well earned beer :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So just to clarify...what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to meet you at OWLED &#8211; hope you enjoy you&#8217;re well earned beer :)</p>
<p>So just to clarify&#8230;what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnGoodwin</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8213</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnGoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8213</guid>
		<description>Good to meet you at OWLED - hope you enjoy you're well earned beer :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So just to clarify...what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to meet you at OWLED &#8211; hope you enjoy you&#8217;re well earned beer :)</p>
<p>So just to clarify&#8230;what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnGoodwin</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/04/03/owl-2/#comment-8211</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnGoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=172#comment-8211</guid>
		<description>Good to meet you at OWLED - hope you enjoy you're well earned beer :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So just to clarify...what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to meet you at OWLED &#8211; hope you enjoy you&#8217;re well earned beer :)</p>
<p>So just to clarify&#8230;what we now commonly know as OWL1.1 has been relabelled OWL2.0, or will OWL2.0 be something different again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
