<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Owlgres: A Scalable OWL Reasoner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/</link>
	<description>Make lots of money through stealth in shadows</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Clark</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7956</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7956</guid>
		<description>Olivier,

I can't speak for the other projects, but Owlgres isn't Postgres-specific or even tied to Postgres. We developed it with Postgres in mind, but we don't any Postgres internals tweaking. Owlgres exists purely at the JDBC level, except for database-specific setup code.

So we could easily make Owlgres work for Oracle or DB2, and probably will do so at some point.

To get the *most* performance, one might tweak some DB internals (which is one reason we *prefer* Postgres), but so far that's not been necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olivier,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak for the other projects, but Owlgres isn&#8217;t Postgres-specific or even tied to Postgres. We developed it with Postgres in mind, but we don&#8217;t any Postgres internals tweaking. Owlgres exists purely at the JDBC level, except for database-specific setup code.</p>
<p>So we could easily make Owlgres work for Oracle or DB2, and probably will do so at some point.</p>
<p>To get the <strong>most</strong> performance, one might tweak some DB internals (which is one reason we <strong>prefer</strong> Postgres), but so far that&#8217;s not been necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolive</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7952</link>
		<dc:creator>lolive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7952</guid>
		<description>IBM is working on a DLP (and now DL) engine on top of DB2.
there is an attempt from the EPFL to add such support to Oracle. OwlGres is targetted at Postgres.

Definitely there is something to investigate, it seems :)

From a developper point of view, I have a concern.
Is it possible to abstract such a technology from the RDBMS?
So we are not tied to a given "vendor".

Or does it require fine tuning of the database internals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM is working on a DLP (and now DL) engine on top of DB2.<br />
there is an attempt from the EPFL to add such support to Oracle. OwlGres is targetted at Postgres.</p>
<p>Definitely there is something to investigate, it seems :)</p>
<p>From a developper point of view, I have a concern.<br />
Is it possible to abstract such a technology from the RDBMS?<br />
So we are not tied to a given &#8220;vendor&#8221;.</p>
<p>Or does it require fine tuning of the database internals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owlgres, DL-Lite and Selectivity Optimizations &#124; Thinking Clearly</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7652</link>
		<dc:creator>Owlgres, DL-Lite and Selectivity Optimizations &#124; Thinking Clearly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7652</guid>
		<description>[...] have been blogging about Owlgres, our scalable OWL reasoner for DL-Lite. Recently, we have been playing with DBpedia, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been blogging about Owlgres, our scalable OWL reasoner for DL-Lite. Recently, we have been playing with DBpedia, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Clark</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7595</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7595</guid>
		<description>John,

There will be a first public release soonish; we'll be giving demos at OWLED next week, and I think some Ordnance Survey folks will be there. After that, we'll make a public release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>There will be a first public release soonish; we&#8217;ll be giving demos at OWLED next week, and I think some Ordnance Survey folks will be there. After that, we&#8217;ll make a public release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnGoodwin</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7594</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnGoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7594</guid>
		<description>Is there a demo version we can download and experiment with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a demo version we can download and experiment with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Smith</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7588</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-7588</guid>
		<description>Readers should note that LUBM, as generally used, is not expressible in DL-Lite because it uses transitive properties and because qualified existentials are used in the left side of subsumption relations.  The results presented here are with a modified version that reduces the expressivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers should note that LUBM, as generally used, is not expressible in DL-Lite because it uses transitive properties and because qualified existentials are used in the left side of subsumption relations.  The results presented here are with a modified version that reduces the expressivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
