<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Distinguished is Your Variable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/12/20/how-distinguished-is-your-variable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/12/20/how-distinguished-is-your-variable/</link>
	<description>Make lots of money through stealth in shadows</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: syosi</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/12/20/how-distinguished-is-your-variable/#comment-7323</link>
		<dc:creator>syosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/12/20/how-distinguished-is-your-variable/#comment-7323</guid>
		<description>I don't know about other tools but cwm (http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm) is an rdf processor that consistently treats bnodes as existential variables. Cwm has a forward chaining rule engine. I'm not sure how much what you said applies, because cwm does not understand owl. A rule like

{?X a :Parent} =&#62; {?X :hasChild []} .

does what is expected, that every parent has a (possibly different) child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about other tools but cwm (http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm) is an rdf processor that consistently treats bnodes as existential variables. Cwm has a forward chaining rule engine. I&#8217;m not sure how much what you said applies, because cwm does not understand owl. A rule like</p>
<p>{?X a :Parent} => {?X :hasChild []} .</p>
<p>does what is expected, that every parent has a (possibly different) child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syosi</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/12/20/how-distinguished-is-your-variable/#comment-8564</link>
		<dc:creator>syosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/12/20/how-distinguished-is-your-variable/#comment-8564</guid>
		<description>I don't know about other tools but cwm (&lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm"&gt;http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm&lt;/a&gt;) is an rdf processor that consistently treats bnodes as existential variables. Cwm has a forward chaining rule engine. I'm not sure how much what you said applies, because cwm does not understand owl. A rule like&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;{?X a :Parent} =&#62; {?X :hasChild []} .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;does what is expected, that every parent has a (possibly different) child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about other tools but cwm (<a href="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm">http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm</a>) is an rdf processor that consistently treats bnodes as existential variables. Cwm has a forward chaining rule engine. I&#8217;m not sure how much what you said applies, because cwm does not understand owl. A rule like</p>
<p>{?X a :Parent} => {?X :hasChild []} .</p>
<p>does what is expected, that every parent has a (possibly different) child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syosi</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/12/20/how-distinguished-is-your-variable/#comment-8188</link>
		<dc:creator>syosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/12/20/how-distinguished-is-your-variable/#comment-8188</guid>
		<description>I don't know about other tools but cwm (&lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm"&gt;http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm&lt;/a&gt;) is an rdf processor that consistently treats bnodes as existential variables. Cwm has a forward chaining rule engine. I'm not sure how much what you said applies, because cwm does not understand owl. A rule like&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;{?X a :Parent} =&#62; {?X :hasChild []} .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;does what is expected, that every parent has a (possibly different) child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about other tools but cwm (<a href="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm">http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm</a>) is an rdf processor that consistently treats bnodes as existential variables. Cwm has a forward chaining rule engine. I&#8217;m not sure how much what you said applies, because cwm does not understand owl. A rule like</p>
<p>{?X a :Parent} => {?X :hasChild []} .</p>
<p>does what is expected, that every parent has a (possibly different) child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
