Comments on: Why not SPARQL (for DBLP)? http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/03/19/why-not-sparql-for-dblp/ Make lots of money through stealth in shadows Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:09:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Bijan Parsia http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/03/19/why-not-sparql-for-dblp/comment-page-1/#comment-4491 Bijan Parsia Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:45:09 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/03/19/why-not-sparql-for-dblp/#comment-4491 I hope it was a good surprise! I'd be interested in what you come up with. I hope it was a good surprise!

I’d be interested in what you come up with.

]]> By: florent http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/03/19/why-not-sparql-for-dblp/comment-page-1/#comment-4488 florent Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:43:45 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/03/19/why-not-sparql-for-dblp/#comment-4488 Hi, I was really surprised to see my comment again... The answer is really interesting. In fact, it's true I was looking for some kind of tech show. I discovered this RDF DBLP two days before on the W3C SWEO wiki, and I was looking for a way to integrate it in Exhibit... so when I saw your post, my first though was "same data, same result but the middle is different..." Maybe my comment was kind of a "lazy web" one to see if you would do the job ;) But I must agree plain DBLP is much easier to use right now. On the other side, more interesting than RDF DBLP is SwetoDBLP http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/semdis/swetodblp/ but it's only available as a dump and I wouldn't deal with a triple store just for that... Also, this Exhibit/sparql looks really interresting, I might give it a try.... Hi,

I was really surprised to see my comment again…
The answer is really interesting. In fact, it’s true I was looking for some kind of tech show. I discovered this RDF DBLP two days before on the W3C SWEO wiki, and I was looking for a way to integrate it in Exhibit… so when I saw your post, my first though was “same data, same result but the middle is different…” Maybe my comment was kind of a “lazy web” one to see if you would do the job ;)
But I must agree plain DBLP is much easier to use right now. On the other side, more interesting than RDF DBLP is SwetoDBLP http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/semdis/swetodblp/ but it’s only available as a dump and I wouldn’t deal with a triple store just for that…
Also, this Exhibit/sparql looks really interresting, I might give it a try….

]]>