Comments on: Snow, SPARQL, and SoemthingElseThatBeginsWithS http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/ Make lots of money through stealth in shadows Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:59:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Bijan Parsia http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-3489 Bijan Parsia Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:33:14 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-3489 So, I heard. Our snow disappeared almost as soon as it happen. Sigh. Re: What DAWG Does. Sure, clearly it's not something for the group at this time, but either a member submission or a WG submission isn't a bad idea. After all, they'll be in CR at some point soon (we all hope :)), and even a rec track for such a thing wouldn't be too hard given its parasitic nature. On the other hand, I don't know it needs to be a rec, or any other W3C document, rather than a nice spec. So, I heard. Our snow disappeared almost as soon as it happen. Sigh.

Re: What DAWG Does. Sure, clearly it’s not something for the group at this time, but either a member submission or a WG submission isn’t a bad idea. After all, they’ll be in CR at some point soon (we all hope :)), and even a rec track for such a thing wouldn’t be too hard given its parasitic nature.

On the other hand, I don’t know it needs to be a rec, or any other W3C document, rather than a nice spec.

]]> By: Bijan Parsia http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8470 Bijan Parsia Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:33:14 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8470 So, I heard. Our snow disappeared almost as soon as it happen. Sigh.<br><br>Re: What DAWG Does. Sure, clearly it's not something for the group at this time, but either a member submission or a WG submission isn't a bad idea. After all, they'll be in CR at some point soon (we all hope :)), and even a rec track for such a thing wouldn't be too hard given its parasitic nature.<br><br>On the other hand, I don't know it needs to be a rec, or any other W3C document, rather than a nice spec. So, I heard. Our snow disappeared almost as soon as it happen. Sigh.

Re: What DAWG Does. Sure, clearly it’s not something for the group at this time, but either a member submission or a WG submission isn’t a bad idea. After all, they’ll be in CR at some point soon (we all hope :)), and even a rec track for such a thing wouldn’t be too hard given its parasitic nature.

On the other hand, I don’t know it needs to be a rec, or any other W3C document, rather than a nice spec.

]]> By: Bijan Parsia http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8404 Bijan Parsia Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:33:14 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8404 So, I heard. Our snow disappeared almost as soon as it happen. Sigh.<br><br>Re: What DAWG Does. Sure, clearly it's not something for the group at this time, but either a member submission or a WG submission isn't a bad idea. After all, they'll be in CR at some point soon (we all hope :)), and even a rec track for such a thing wouldn't be too hard given its parasitic nature.<br><br>On the other hand, I don't know it needs to be a rec, or any other W3C document, rather than a nice spec. So, I heard. Our snow disappeared almost as soon as it happen. Sigh.

Re: What DAWG Does. Sure, clearly it’s not something for the group at this time, but either a member submission or a WG submission isn’t a bad idea. After all, they’ll be in CR at some point soon (we all hope :)), and even a rec track for such a thing wouldn’t be too hard given its parasitic nature.

On the other hand, I don’t know it needs to be a rec, or any other W3C document, rather than a nice spec.

]]> By: Bijan Parsia http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8311 Bijan Parsia Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:33:14 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8311 So, I heard. Our snow disappeared almost as soon as it happen. Sigh.<br><br>Re: What DAWG Does. Sure, clearly it's not something for the group at this time, but either a member submission or a WG submission isn't a bad idea. After all, they'll be in CR at some point soon (we all hope :)), and even a rec track for such a thing wouldn't be too hard given its parasitic nature.<br><br>On the other hand, I don't know it needs to be a rec, or any other W3C document, rather than a nice spec. So, I heard. Our snow disappeared almost as soon as it happen. Sigh.

Re: What DAWG Does. Sure, clearly it’s not something for the group at this time, but either a member submission or a WG submission isn’t a bad idea. After all, they’ll be in CR at some point soon (we all hope :)), and even a rec track for such a thing wouldn’t be too hard given its parasitic nature.

On the other hand, I don’t know it needs to be a rec, or any other W3C document, rather than a nice spec.

]]> By: Kendall Clark http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-3487 Kendall Clark Mon, 22 Jan 2007 04:56:57 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-3487 Hmm, a bit odd to post a comment to this weblog, but DC got its first snow all winter today, which is a bit of an odd coincidence. As for SparqlX, yeah, I'd like to see that revived; but DAWG shouldn't be distracted with it at this point, I think. Better that we should just make it a Member Submission and see what happens. Actually, we could do something with it when we do something with SPARQL-DL? Hmm, a bit odd to post a comment to this weblog, but DC got its first snow all winter today, which is a bit of an odd coincidence.

As for SparqlX, yeah, I’d like to see that revived; but DAWG shouldn’t be distracted with it at this point, I think. Better that we should just make it a Member Submission and see what happens.

Actually, we could do something with it when we do something with SPARQL-DL?

]]> By: Kendall Clark http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8469 Kendall Clark Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:56:57 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8469 Hmm, a bit odd to post a comment to this weblog, but DC got its first snow all winter today, which is a bit of an odd coincidence.<br><br>As for SparqlX, yeah, I'd like to see that revived; but DAWG shouldn't be distracted with it at this point, I think. Better that we should just make it a Member Submission and see what happens.<br><br>Actually, we could do something with it when we do something with SPARQL-DL? Hmm, a bit odd to post a comment to this weblog, but DC got its first snow all winter today, which is a bit of an odd coincidence.

As for SparqlX, yeah, I’d like to see that revived; but DAWG shouldn’t be distracted with it at this point, I think. Better that we should just make it a Member Submission and see what happens.

Actually, we could do something with it when we do something with SPARQL-DL?

]]> By: Kendall Clark http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8403 Kendall Clark Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:56:57 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8403 Hmm, a bit odd to post a comment to this weblog, but DC got its first snow all winter today, which is a bit of an odd coincidence.<br><br>As for SparqlX, yeah, I'd like to see that revived; but DAWG shouldn't be distracted with it at this point, I think. Better that we should just make it a Member Submission and see what happens.<br><br>Actually, we could do something with it when we do something with SPARQL-DL? Hmm, a bit odd to post a comment to this weblog, but DC got its first snow all winter today, which is a bit of an odd coincidence.

As for SparqlX, yeah, I’d like to see that revived; but DAWG shouldn’t be distracted with it at this point, I think. Better that we should just make it a Member Submission and see what happens.

Actually, we could do something with it when we do something with SPARQL-DL?

]]> By: Kendall Clark http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8310 Kendall Clark Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:56:57 +0000 http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/01/21/snow-sparql-and-soemthingelsethatbeginswiths/#comment-8310 Hmm, a bit odd to post a comment to this weblog, but DC got its first snow all winter today, which is a bit of an odd coincidence.<br><br>As for SparqlX, yeah, I'd like to see that revived; but DAWG shouldn't be distracted with it at this point, I think. Better that we should just make it a Member Submission and see what happens.<br><br>Actually, we could do something with it when we do something with SPARQL-DL? Hmm, a bit odd to post a comment to this weblog, but DC got its first snow all winter today, which is a bit of an odd coincidence.

As for SparqlX, yeah, I’d like to see that revived; but DAWG shouldn’t be distracted with it at this point, I think. Better that we should just make it a Member Submission and see what happens.

Actually, we could do something with it when we do something with SPARQL-DL?

]]>