<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why not an XG for OWL 1.1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2005/12/24/why-not-an-xg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2005/12/24/why-not-an-xg/</link>
	<description>Make lots of money through stealth in shadows</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harry Chen Thinks Aloud &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Features in OWL 1.1</title>
		<link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2005/12/24/why-not-an-xg/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Chen Thinks Aloud &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Features in OWL 1.1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/?p=17#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] Why not an XG for OWL 1.1? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why not an XG for OWL 1.1? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
